The HVAC Standoff: Why Doing Nothing Is Costing You Millions

A persistent landlord–tenant stalemate over energy investment is quietly eroding asset value, when shared optimisation could increase NOI, strengthen sustainability metrics, and benefit both sides.
Learn more about this thing
The Stand-Off That’s Costing Everyone
There’s a quiet stalemate in commercial property. The tenant pays the utility bills. The landlord owns the asset. The HVAC plant ticks along, consuming energy and capital in equal measure, and no one quite wants to blink first.
The landlord thinks, “The rent roll is secure. The yield is fine. Why disturb it?”
The tenant thinks, “Why should I fund improvements that enhance someone else’s building?”
Both positions make sense. And yet, both are flawed.
Because doing nothing isn’t neutral. An underperforming building drifts. Energy intensity stays high. CRREM pathways tighten. GRESB and NABERS scores begin to carry more weight in investor conversations. Occupiers scrutinise wellness and air quality with fresh seriousness. A building that feels dated soon becomes priced that way.
Symphony’s optimisation approach shows HVAC energy reductions of 60–80%, alongside measurable improvements in Wellness, CRREM, GRESB and NABERS metrics . That’s not marginal gain. That’s structural improvement. And structural improvement flows straight through to asset perception — and value.
Ignore it, and the yield you’re protecting may quietly erode.
The Financial Logic We Don’t Always Say Out Loud
Here’s the part we tend to skirt around.
The tenant’s total occupancy cost is rent plus service charge. Reduce operating costs, and you create headroom. Headroom that allows rent to grow over time without increasing the tenant’s overall burden.
Translated into investment language: higher NOI. And higher NOI means a more valuable asset.
What looks like a five-year payback to the tenant through energy savings can, when reflected in asset value, equate to something closer to a five-week return for the landlord. Symphony’s value data highlights five-year payback on savings alone, with potential 5% asset value uplift repaying investment in around a month .
If the tenant resists funding the works alone because he recognises the landlord benefits — that’s proof enough the asset value improves when performance improves.
It’s almost a lesson in stewardship. The building is a shared responsibility, even if the lease suggests otherwise. And stewardship, in commercial terms, simply means managing what you own so it grows in worth.
Shared Investment = Shared Gain
So what’s the sensible path? Not charity. Not conflict. Partnership.
Consider a model where landlord and tenant co-invest — perhaps 25% and 75% respectively — with the tenant retaining 100% of the energy savings. The tenant benefits immediately through reduced utility costs and stronger sustainability credentials. The landlord benefits through enhanced asset value, improved retention, and a more attractive exit profile.
The technology exists to make this practical. Symphony Cycle recycles HVAC waste heat into usable energy without major infrastructure change . Symphony Cloud provides a single source of truth for building performance and ESG reporting . Symphony Welltech monitors air quality and occupancy while controlling comfort in real time, balancing efficiency with occupant wellbeing .
It’s commercially rational. It’s operationally viable. And frankly, it’s overdue.
When landlord and tenant act together, the building stops being a point of tension and becomes a shared asset in the truest sense. Lower costs. Higher NOI. Stronger sustainability metrics. A more valuable building.
Not a compromise — a common good.